Ethical Guidelines | Our commitment

This understanding of fairness should not be limited to governance but rather include the entire reference system of our company. We could implement it, for example, by categorically rejecting tax avoidance, in measuring and evaluating the impact of our work on the environment, and in attempting CO2 compensation when avoidance was not possible.

Ultimately, we see fair cooperation not only as a shared responsibility but also as an economic necessity. As a company, we see ourselves in a constant process, striving for improvement.

We have a 2-tier process for evaluating clients:

• Quick Check
• Ethical investigation group

In order to structure the findings, we created an evaluation template to be filled out in each step.

Every potential new project should be evaluated against our guidelines in a quick check. In case of concerns, those should be added to our internal project lead workflow documentation.

Basic research:

• Check the website
• Check sources (Fair Finance Guide, SIPRI, Tagesschau.de, ...)
• Look / ask for clients ethical guidelines
• Validate against our No-Gos

In most cases, someone on the team might have more insights regarding certain companies / industries / topics and will inform the team about those concerns.

If this is the case, the person should pick a buddy to work on the ethical aspect of the project following our predefined template. The ethical guidelines group will support you with any questions and ideally one of the group members should join the investigation group.

Notes:

• The investigation has to be finished within a week
• The investigation should not take longer than 8 hours
• Talk to the client openly about concerns
• Donations could be interesting because some NGOs have guidelines regarding donations

If a client does any of the following, we won't work with them:

• Tax evasion
• Arms / weapons industry
• Slavery / child labor
• Strong environmental offenses

If a client has a customer doing any of the above, we have to discuss it per case.

• The Ethical investigation group presents their findings during the following weekly meeting
• Everyone with concerns can vote against the project
• The founders will consider the investigation and votes and decide about the project in a founders meeting
• Everyone should consider consequences – like a potential lack of jobs and financial implications
• Someone who voted against the job does not have to be part of the project team